Why d’you have to make things complicated?

Types of Trust (UK specific) explained, and why they are used

Trusts are something that people often get worried about – they think it’s all too complex and not for them.  But basically it’s about putting a defined amount of money (or other assets) under someone else’s control for the benefit of defined group of people (and you choose who those people are).  The person who is listed as the owner is not necessarily entitled to the money themselves, but is looking after it for others.  They are entrusted with its care. 

This is written about UK trusts, but they can exist in other forms in other countries in the world. The choice of trust is important, as there can be adverse tax consequences if you are using the wrong type for the task in hand. This short post is not a substitute for specialist legal advice tailored to your circumstances.

Why would I need one?   

You might be using a trust structure without realizing it – now!  If you and your partner own a house together, then you might both be listed on the deeds.  When you sell, do you each get half of what is left over after expenses?  If you died, would you want your partner to automatically have all the value in the house?  How have you decided the terms of your house ownership with each other? 

If you have a child who is under the age of 18 when you die – who will look after the assets you have on their behalf until they are old enough?  Is 18 old enough to inherit what you have?  Do you have a child who has additional needs?  Do you want them to have all your money when their needs might be lifelong, and they might not be able to manage money well? 

Do you worry about what might happen if your partner meets someone new and forgets about how much they have inherited from you – and spends it on them?  Or if they get into debt, and it eats up not only all their share, but yours as well?  A trust can be a good way of letting your partner have some of the benefit of what you have, but keeping a bit of security, so they don’t spend it (or have it spent for them) 

Are they expensive? 

There will be a cost for setting up your trust.  Running a trust can cost, but then again, if you choose non-lawyers or non-accountants to be your trustees, the cost may be minor, being limited to out of pocket expenses.  Looking after a million pounds means more work to do than if you were being asked to look after a thousand pounds, and you might need professional help.   

Apart from working out what sort of trust suits you and getting the right sort of trust in the beginning, making it work will require some effort, just like running a car or getting a regular haircut. 

Will I need a lawyer all the time? 

Probably not, if you still have an idea of what the responsibilities of a trustee can be.  However, if you are worried, then legal advice is available, if your trustees want to know more.  It can be necessary to have an independent person as a trustee – a friend or someone outside your closest family. 

You mean there are different sorts of trusts? 

Yes – there used to be many more types of trusts – and confusingly, not everyone talks about them using the same labels.  Basically, trusts now can be broken down into four types: 

  1. The bare trust 
  1. The Interest in possession trust 
  1. The discretionary trust 
  1. The charitable trust. 

A bare trust is similar to a nominee – you decide that someone is to own the asset in name only.  But you expect that the proceeds of sale will not go to the person who appears to own it, but to your choice of recipients 

An Interest in possession is where a named person is entitled to receive the income (or to live rent free) in an asset.  The capital remains safeguarded.  Some sub-types of this sort of trust can also be chosen.  These are usually set up in a will, to take effect after death, for tax reasons. 

A discretionary trust is one where you place the most trust – because it is the most flexible arrangement.  You give your assets to your trustees, identify the people who you want to benefit, and then leave the management of the trust, including how and when people benefit to your trustees.  It is helpful to leave them some written guidance, so that they know what you have in mind – but ultimately, you give them the authority to do the “right thing” with your assets, for the benefit of those whom you have chosen.   

So, a bare trust is quite simple? 

Yes – it’s the sort of thing you have if you purchase a house for a person under 18 – when they turn 18, they can force the trustee to hand it over.  You find this sort of thing when administering an estate – an executor, once they have paid debts, can say that they are holding assets for your benefit – and sell on your behalf, at your direction.   

Interest in Possession sounds really weird… 

This is one of the sorts of trusts that ends up with lots of different names, because the technical name is not really all that catchy.  Sometimes it’s called a property trust – because it’s often used to safeguard a share of the house for the benefit of the surviving member of a couple, so they can continue to live in a house rent free, but without being able to spend it on someone new.  Other names can be “Life Interest Trust”, “home trust” and so on – sometimes there are advisers that use this structure and want to brand it specifically so that it has more appeal.   

Discretionary Trusts sound so complicated.  Why would anyone want them? 

These are the most flexible sort.  If you have a person with a learning disability, they may need money throughout their lives, but may not be able to make significant financial decisions either now or in the future.  They may be able to live independently, but be easily swayed by people who want to take advantage.  They might have a physical disability that could need more and more care as time goes on.  Choosing a discretionary trust structure allows those in charge of it (trustees) all the power they need not only to invest according to the needs of those who benefit, but also to pay out in all sorts of different ways – as and when needed.   

It is true to say that Discretionary Trusts are used in times of uncertainty, for those who are wealthy and who want to pass on money for tax reasons, perhaps for their children not to receive the money too soon, if at all.  Or for business owners who want there to be only a few people that own a block of shares, rather than lots of minor shareholders clamouring for power.  But essentially the structure is the same – two trustees who look after something for the benefit of a range of people.   

You left out charities!

Well, there are not many people who want to set up charities – usually there is a charity to suit every need in existence already.  Sometimes using an existing charity presents the best value for money for those who are in need – saving on set up costs and running costs.  Charities can be made using trust documents, setting out their objectives and who is proposed to benefit.  Similarly, pension fund trusts are less often the creation of an individual – and pension fund trustees have wide powers over what they do to invest, and distribute. 

What else do I need to think about? 

Taxation is something that can come into your decision making process.  If you give a property away, there might be a Capital Gains Tax bill – but your advisers might have a way of postponing this.  If you have a fund larger than £325,000 initially, then there are other considerations for Inheritance Tax.  Inheritance Tax capital gifts also have fairly strict allowances – otherwise they might be a gift that you need to survive by a period of years (7 years to a maximum 14 years from trust gift). As with all Inheritance Tax gifts, you cannot benefit from what you have put into your discretionary trust, or it will not work (1)

During the lifetime of the trust, the size of the fund and how it is invested can be important – because it means there will need to be more financial housekeeping.  This can be a relevant consideration in many cases.   

What do you recommend? 

It depends on what matters the most to you – behind every choice there is a risk and benefit.  There is not really a one-size-fits-all solution for every circumstance, and that is where the advice from your solicitor (or accountant) about a trust can be so beneficial.  For more in –depth analysis of the structures you would like to use, and their implications for your own financial situation, you should consider this general note with tailored advice to suit you. 

(1) There are exceptions to this rule, but only very few. Tread carefully, with advice.

Deed of Variation – getting it wrong, (S142 IHTA)

Deed of Variation – getting it wrong | Withersworldwide.

Referring to the recent case of Vaughan-Jones v Vaughan-Joneswhere a deed of variation was effected in the estate of the husband.  The will of the husband had left assets both to the wife and also to the children.  The amounts left to the children exceeded the Nil Rate Band, and therefore an immediate IHT liability arose on the death.  The deed of variation was completed less than a week before the deadline (before the 2nd anniversary of death) but most importantly, failed to contain the election for Inheritance Tax which arguably was the whole point of the document.

The election for Inheritance Tax is the part of the document that enables, for Inheritance Tax purposes, the deed to be considered as if it was the wish of the deceased, rather than the wish of those who actually inherit.  To fail to include that election makes the document pretty useless – “ineffective”.  The reported case permitted the court to rectify this omission.

The Wither’s article reveals, however, that in the process of arguing the case, it was revealed that the deed of variation was not entered into freely – that the widow (to whom all was transferred so as to secure the 100% spousal relief) and children had participated in the deed in order that the widow would later give the assets back to the children.

A key part of the legistation permitting the election is that it cannot apply where there is any associated financial bargain (or “consideration”) with the election:

142Alteration of dispositions taking effect on death.

(1)Where within the period of two years after a person’s death—

(a)any of the dipositions (whether effected by will, under the law relating to intestacy or otherwise) of the property comprised in his estate immediately before his death are varied, or

(b)the benefit conferred by any of those dispositions is disclaimed,

by an instrument in writing made by the persons or any of the persons who benefit or would benefit under the dispositions, this Act shall apply as if the variation had been effected by the deceased or, as the case may be, the disclaimed benefit had never been conferred.

[F1(2)Subsection (1) above shall not apply to a variation unless the instrument contains a statement, made by all the relevant persons, to the effect that they intend the subsection to apply to the variation.

(2A)For the purposes of subsection (2) above the relevant persons are—

(a)the person or persons making the instrument, and

(b)where the variation results in additional tax being payable, the personal representatives.

Personal representatives may decline to make a statement under subsection (2) above only if no, or no sufficient, assets are held by them in that capacity for discharging the additional tax.]

(3)Subsection (1) above shall not apply to a variation or disclaimer made for any consideration in money or money’s worth other than consideration consisting of the making, in respect of another of the dispositions, of a variation or disclaimer to which that subsection applies.

(4)Where a variation to which subsection (1) above applies results in property being held in trust for a person for a period which ends not more than two years after the death, this Act shall apply as if the disposition of the property that takes effect at the end of the period had had effect from the beginning of the period; but this subsection shall not affect the application of this Act in relation to any distribution or application of property occurring before that disposition takes effect.

(5)For the purposes of subsection (1) above the property comprised in a person’s estate includes any excluded property but not any property to which he is treated as entitled by virtue of section 49(1) above [F2or section 102 of the Finance Act 1986].

(6)Subsection (1) above applies whether or not the administration of the estate is complete or the property concerned has been distributed in accordance with the original dispositions.

(7)In the application of subsection (4) above to Scotland, property which is subject to a proper liferent shall be deemed to be held in trust for the liferenter.

Finance Act 1986 Sch. 19, para. 24,with effect from 18March 1986. 

Budget 2015 – Deeds of Variation Warning

Taken together, all the new measures against tax avoidance and evasion will raise £3.1 billion over the forecast period.

I can also tell the House that we will conduct a review on the avoidance of inheritance tax through the use of deeds of variation. It will report by the autumn.

We will seek a wide range of views.

Mr Deputy Speaker, my RHF the Chief Secretary will tomorrow publish further details of our comprehensive plans for new criminal offences for tax evasion and new penalties for those professionals who assist them.

Let the message go out: this country’s tolerance for those who will not pay their fair share of taxes has come to an end.

So – fair warning that deeds of variation are scheduled for revision.  It’s one of those things that is constantly under threat – but now seems to be very definitely a target.

So, all estates currently in administration should endeavour to get variations completed before election day, to be on the safe side,,,

And those affluent children with elderly parents really need to encourage them to think about changing their wills, now more so than ever before.