“I’m not a tenant! we own the house!” – Joint Tenancy and Tenancy in Common Explained

Owning a property in the UK is something quite a lot of people do – if they are not the sole owner, then clearly they own it with someone else – and that is where the words “tenants in common” and “beneficial joint tenants” come into play.

For example, you might be talking about a freehold (you own the land and the building on it) or leasehold (you own a flat for a period of years, that will eventually expire). You might own with or without a mortgage. But if you own with someone else, you have to describe the way you own it. There are two ways.

Beneficial Joint Tenancy (often shortened to Joint tenants)

This is ownership that the majority of married couples choose, unless they have had taxplanning advice – it means that although both owners are shown on the title deeds, they each have the right to the whole of the property, between them. If one owner dies, the remaining owner is entitled to the whole of the sale proceeds. The ownership passes like a bank account – all that is required is the submission of a death certificate and the completion of a form DJP sent to H M Land Registry.

Tenancy in Common

This is where instead of both owners owning an undivided share, each owner has said that they own a separate share of the proceeds of sale. It doesn’t mean literally putting up walls in the house and segregated areas (although that’s often the joke).

It means that on the death of one of the owners, the ownership of their share passes under their will (or if they have no will, on intestacy) – they can control what happens to their share.

How can you tell which is which?

When you buy a house, your conveyancing solicitor will ask you to sign a document that effects the transfer from the old owner to you – on that document, there is a box to tick saying how you want to own it.

If you subsequently want to change the ownership, then you will need to complete a severance, send the Land Registry form to the Land Registry. They will then send you a new version of the title deed showing that there is a restriction on who can receive the proceeds of sale.

Why do I want to know? What’s the point?

If you are owning a house with your brother, you might want your share to go to your family when you die – or at least to have a say in whether that should happen. If you are getting divorced, you might want to make sure that if you died, your share would pass following your will. If you want to set up arrangements whereby you control what happens to “your share” of the house, you need to start from the position of actually having a share.

Why should you make Lasting Powers of Attorney and pay all that money to a solicitor?

On being asked by a colleague why (entre nous) it would be a
good idea to get some expert advice on making LPAs as opposed to just downloading the forms from the internet… 
Are legal fees worth paying, as opposed to doing it yourself?

Well, certainly the forms are available online.  And there is good advice in the explanatory leaflet. You still have to pay for the registration fees.

But that’s as far as it goes in terms of legal advice – and if you want to consider a scenario which is not covered by the advice – or the phrasing of it means you don’t understand, there is not really much of a substitute for being able to ask someone who knows what they are talking about and can answer.  That’s the real reason why you pay a lawyer – to tell you the trips and pitfalls, and to answer tricky scenarios, if you think there might be one for you.  To make sure you really know what you are signing, especially when it is a powerful document.  Sometimes words used in legal documents already have a specifically understood meaning (rather than the basic meaning of ordinary words).  Sometimes phrases like “appropriate investment advice” covers a wide range of what has been considered to be appropriate in different circumstances. 

In addition, if you think it might be a good idea to restrict the powers that you give to attorneys, you might actually be making matters far worse – your wording may in time come to be very restrictive.

If there is, later on, any question about whether you understood what the power was – either given or received – then you may have had a good start if you saw a solicitor who explained it to you, or who gave you some tips and notes for future reference.

Lets be honest, the law applies to all, and breaking it is a possibility – finding ways round scenarios and using the Ways and Means Act – all of those things are what people do in real life – but there has to be a point at which the buck stops – and that is on the written word of the law, and of the power given.   Because human beings are imaginative, there is always the opportunity for a new situation to come up which no one ever thought was an issue.  So the law moves on, shading ever closer to the “real” meaning of a law.   If the sea is blue, then it is cerulean blue, deep blue, wine-dark, green, grey, flecked with white or a certain shade as defined by Pantone?  And which sea?  The sea I view from my window, or yours? the sea in summer, at Margate, or at Whitby?